(Un)employment in South Africa |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistics SA in conjunction
with the Department of Labour recently |
|
| Summary : Two arguments were put forward | Indications: |
| (1) wages are
currently "too high and have a negative effect on the economy's international
competitiveness and its ability to increase employment" and (2) "economic growth is unlikely to be achieved on the basis of low wages paid to significant numbers of workers". The second view sees low wages as a form of subsidy which enables organisations that are unprofitable and inefficient in the economic sense to continue operating. In this case labour market intervention is viewed as necessary in order to bring about restructuring and innovation and to alleviate poverty and inequality |
The findings indicate that income inequality in South Africa is based on industry, skill, gender, race and geographical location. There is also a positive correlation between education and the level of wages. The level of actual earnings shows a correspondence with institutional influences such as unions. Finally the regulated minimum wage bears little correspondence to the actual level of wages earned, especially amongst the lowest skilled workers. |
see also New Developments in Labour Market Statistics from Stats SA.
| Summary & Conclusion | Indications: |
| Summary
: Statistics SA have released figures in the October household survey for 1998,
showing that employment has, contrary to expectations, actually increased from 1996 to
1998. However, this marginal increase (1.1%) has chiefly come from the sharp (32%) growth
in informal sector employment over this period, where informal sector employment is
defined by Stats SA as unregistered business "run from homes, street pavements or
other informal arrangements". Formal sector workers who have lost their jobs have
found work mainly in the agriculture and informal sectors over this period. However, the
substitution of formal sector work for informal work is not as desirable a solution as may
first be believed. Conclusion : Amongst the jobs classed as informal sector employment are activities at sub-subsistence level such as the sale of self grown subsistence vegetables, "car guards" or those selling self made bead work on pavements. While providing a marginal means raising some money, these jobs cannot support an individual or a whole family nor do they do they contribute to the upliftment of the poor by failing to provide skills or increase productivity levels. In comparison, formal sector jobs are relatively secure and well paid, providing incumbents with a certain level of skills. This "solution" to formal sector job loss is unlikely to appease COSATU who has recently a held a strike against the high levels of unemployment (the official level of unemployment in 1998 was 25.2%). |
Racial job inequality further problem : Unemployment is a very emotive issue and the social unrest which it will generate in the longer term will just be exacerbated by the very unequal distribution of jobs along racial lines. In 1998 (latest statistics), African females in non-urban areas faced the highest levels of unemployment (39.9%) against White urban males who faced the lowest levels of unemployment (4.2%). Africans faced a total unemployment level of 33.4%, Coloureds 15.8%, Indians 14.8% and Whites a low 4.5%. SA's unemployment problems remain a powder keg which is in no way defused by the latest employment figures. |
| Macro | Financial | Growth | Retail | Motor | Printing | Back | |
|
econometrix |
01-Mar- 04 |